Nest week the new Star Trek film will be released, and even though I do not have high hopes for it I still feel an odd excitement. This shows that all you have to do to interest me in a movie is throw the name of a franchise I like on the cover, since these Star Trek movies don't really share a lot in common with Star Trek other than the character names. But since this movie is coming out next week I have decided to do Star Trek themed posts in honour of it (Judging by how often I post, this will probably be the only one). I would like do one before the movie comes out, explaining my problem with the portrayal of James T. Kirk in the new film but who knows if I will get to that. I may also do a review of Star Trek Into Darkness after I see it. So the next while may only be Star Trek posts, but this is my blog and I can obsess over Star Trek for a couple weeks if I want to. But none of this is certain to happen, so we shall see.
The Enterprise represents the current state of the Star Trek franchise. |
If there is one thing that people universally respect and admire it is fan theories. And so I give to you my only "fan theory" or at least the one I have put the most thought into. I call it the Q Source Hypothesis1 because I think I am funny, but unfortunately that may only be a delusion. The hypothesis itself originates from a scene in Star Trek: Enterprise2 which closely mirrors the final scene in the movie Star Trek: First Contact. Basically what happens is that humanity is greeted by Vulcans and instead of reciprocating the greeting they shoot all the Vulcans and rob their ship. This of course turns out to have happened in the Mirror Universe, which is a alternate universe in Star Trek in which everyone is a jerk.
So lets forget about the whole Mirror Universe thing for a second and instead go to Star Trek: The Next Generation. In the very first episode, the Enterprise encounters a being who claims to be omnipotent. He is referred to as Q. He also claims that humanity is a dangerous savage child race. This is very offensive to the Enterprise crew since if there is one thing that the Next Generation characters are sure of it is their general superiority over everyone else. So they explain that humanity is good and progressively getting better. Q drags them off to a barbaric trial from the dark ages in Earth's 21st Century. They are given a chance to prove that they are better than they appear and Q lets them go. After this Q appears in two distinct modes; he sometimes comes to the ship as a trickster and other times as a teacher.3 For the sake of this interpretation, I will maintain that even when he was being a trickster he was actually testing the crew. In his second appearance, for example, he offers Riker a chance to become a Q. Eventually Riker turns him down when he realizes that his powers are already corrupting him. One could interpret this as Q actually inviting him to become a Q, but I think it makes more sense to see it as Q testing his resolve and convictions in the face of absolute temptation.
"Judge Q, to you." |
Alright, I am almost done here. This now brings us to Star Trek: First Contact in which Picard chases the Borg back in time to prevent them from destroying the human race. Once there they send Riker to help Zefram Cochrane bring a ship to warp speed. While there Riker teaches him about all those wonderful Federation values.
Locutus of Borg: For some reason a hive mind with no concept of individuality still thought Borg Picard needed a name. |
Only through divine intervention could this man create a Utopia. |
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9TdvN07ZWI
3.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBwoEXlTph0
4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuzoxcErOc8
I've always doubted the whole "society without poverty, greed, or crime" angle. Maybe it makes me closed-minded, cynical, and unimaginative, but when I hear "society without crime", I hear "police state". When I hear "society without poverty", I hear "head in the sand". And as for "society without greed"... well, Star Trek proves that wrong frequently enough.
ReplyDeleteActually, that description puts me less in mind of the United Federation of Planets and more of President Clark's administration in Babylon 5.
Sheridan: "[Lurkers are] our version of the homeless. In many ways, we have the same problems Earth does."
Julie Musante: "Earth doesn't have homeless."
Sheridan: "Excuse me?"
Musante: "We don't have the problem. Yes, there are some displaced people here and there. But they've chosen to be in that position. They're either lazy or criminal or mentally unstable."
Sheridan: "They can't get a job."
Musante: "Earthgov has promised a job to anyone who wants one. So if someone doesn't have a job, they must not want one."
Sheridan: "Poverty?"
Musante: "It's the same."
Sheridan: "Crime?"
Musante: "Yes, there is some, but it's all caused by the mentally unstable. And we've just instituted correctional centres to filter them out at an early age."
Sheridan: "Prejudice?"
Musante: "No, we're just one happy planet. Well, all right, there's the Marsies, but that won't happen until they stop fighting Earth rule."
Sheridan: "When exactly did all of this happen.
Musante: "When we rewrote the dictionary."
Maybe there's an idea for your next Star Trek blog entry: how the Federation rewrote the dictionary.